Brooks R. Holland, J.D.

Associate Dean for Academic Affairs

Brooks Holland joined the faculty of Gonzaga University School of Law in 2005 after eleven years of practice as a public defender in the Bronx and Manhattan. Holland’s experience representing clients in New York, and his continuing experience as...

Brooks R. Holland

Contact Information

Education & Curriculum Vitae

J.D., Boston University

B.A., Political ScienceSan Francisco State University

Curriculum Vitae

Courses Taught

Criminal Law

Criminal Procedure

Advanced Criminal Procedure

Constitutional Law I

Professional Responsibility


Brooks Holland joined the faculty of Gonzaga University School of Law in 2005 after eleven years of practice as a public defender in the Bronx and Manhattan. Holland’s experience representing clients in New York, and his continuing experience as a federal appellate lawyer, inspire his interest in working with future lawyers to prepare them for the rewards, rigors, and vital impact a career in law can offer.

At Gonzaga, Holland teaches professional responsibility, criminal law, criminal procedure, and advanced criminal procedure. Holland also has taught comparative criminal law, trial advocacy, constitutional law, and perspectives on the law. In all of these courses, Holland strives to ensure that students understand not only the critical doctrine, but also the opportunities lawyers have to build a fulfilling professional identity, to contribute to the legal system, and to impact the lives other individuals.

Holland’s scholarly agenda tracks these teaching goals by focusing on the intersection of professional responsibility with criminal law and social justice. For example, Holland writes and speaks regularly on criminal law and procedure topics that implicate the professional roles of defense lawyers, prosecutors, and judges. Holland also writes about access to justice issues in both the criminal and civil arenas. For instance, Holland has written and presented extensively on Washington State’s new limited license legal technician program, which permits legal professionals without a traditional J.D. degree to obtain a limited law license, broadening opportunities for low- and moderate-income individuals to secure trained legal assistance. Holland also recently co-authored the first edition of a professional responsibility textbook, Learning Professional Responsibility: From the Classroom to the Practice of Law (West 2015).

Holland believes that community service is an important component of his responsibility as a legal educator. Holland is the Chair of the Washington State Bar Association’s Council on Public Defense. This Council is responsible for addressing the quality and availability of indigent defense services in Washington State, and it promulgated the indigent defense standards recently adopted by the Washington Supreme Court. Holland also served on the Washington State Bar Association committee that that drafted the Rules of Professional Conduct for legal technicians, and chaired the subcommittee that drafted Title 5 of those Rules. Holland further is on the Board of Governors of the Society of American Law Teachers, the preeminent professional association of law teachers committed to social justice and diversity. In addition to this service, Holland is a member of the ACLU-WA Legal Committee and a former Board member, participated on the screening committee for the A.B.A. Silver Gavel Award for Media and the Arts, and has served on the N.Y.C. Bar Association Criminal Law Committee.

In 2015, Holland assumed the position of the J. Donald and Va Lena Scarpelli Curran Family Chair in Legal Ethics and Professionalism. Grateful for this opportunity, Holland will continue to use his teaching, scholarship, and community service to support the ability of lawyers and other legal professionals to provide a just and ethical legal system for all persons.

Books

LEARNING PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY: FROM THE CLASSROOM TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW (1st ed. West 2015) (with Leah Christensen)

Book Chapters

WASHINGTON LEGAL ETHICS DESKBOOK, The Ethics of Criminal Practice (WSBA 2nd ed. 2017) (forthcoming)

Academic Journals

Anticipatory Self-Defense Claims as a Lens for Re-Examining Zealous Advocacy and Anti-Bias Disciplinary Norms, 49 TEXAS TECH. L. REV. 1 (2016)

Teaching Miranda at Its 50th Anniversary, 80 J. SOCIAL ED. 20 (2016)

The Two-Sided Speedy Trial Problem, 90 WASH. L. REV. ONLINE 31 (2015)

The Call for Lawyers Committed to Social Justice to Champion Accessible Legal Services through Innovative Legal Education, 16 NEV. L.J. 251 (2015) (with Olympia Duhart & George Critchlow)

Miranda v. Arizona: 50 Years of Judicial Regulation of Police Interrogation, 16 INSIGHTS ON LAW & SOCIETY 4 (2015)

Washington State’s Legal Technician Limited License Practice Rule: A National First in Access to Justice, 82 MISS. L.J. SUPRA 75 (2013)

Crawford and Beyond: How Far Have We Traveled from Roberts after All?, 20 J.L. & POL’Y 517 (2012)

Imagining the Open Road, 1 FLA. L. REV. F. 1 (2012)

Race and Ambivalent Criminal Procedure Remedies, 47 GONZ. L. REV. 341 (2012)

Racial Profiling and a Punitive Exclusionary Rule, 20 TEMP. POL. & CIV. RTS. L. REV. 29 (2010)

The Exclusionary Rule as Punishment, 36 RUTGERS L. REC. 38 (2009)

A Relational Sixth Amendment during Interrogation, 99 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 381 (2009)

Confidentiality & Candor under the 2006 Washington Rules of Professional Conduct, 43 GONZAGA L. REV. 327 (2008)

The Road ‘Round Edmond: Steering through Primary Purposes and Crime Control Agendas, 111 PENN. ST. L. REV. 293 (2006)

Holistic Advocacy: An Important but Limited Institutional Role, 30 N.Y.U. REV. L. & SOC. CHANGE 637 (2006)

Testimonial Statements under Crawford: What Makes Testimony … Testimonial?, 71 BROOK. L. REV. 281 (2005)

Using Excited Utterances to Prosecute Domestic Violence in New York: The Door Opens Wide, or Just a Crack?, 8 CARDOZO WOMEN’S L.J. 171 (2002)

Safeguarding Equal Protection Rights: The Search for an Exclusionary Rule under the Equal Protection Clause, 37 AM. CRIM. L. REV. 1107 (2000)

Section 60.41 of the N.Y. Criminal Procedure Law: The Sexual Assault Reform Act of 1999 Challenges Molineux and Due Process, 27 FORDHAM URB. L.J. 435 (1999)

Professional Journals

What Are the Double Jeopardy Consequences of an Acquittal on a Related Conviction That Is Vacated?, 44 PREVIEW 24 (2016)

 When Is an Extortion Victim also a Partner in Crime? Defining the Scope of Hobbs Act Conspiratorial Liability, 43 PREVIEW 27 (2015) 

One Fish, Two Fish … 72 Red Grouper Fish: Is a Fish Just a Fish or Is It also a “Tangible Object” under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act?, 42 PREVIEW 70 (2014)

Criminal Procedure in the October 2013 Term: Cell Phones and Some Other Stuff, 41 PREVIEW 321 (2014)

The Fourth Amendment in the October 2012 Term, 40 ABA SUP. CT. PREVIEW 336 (2013)

Does a Judge’s Participation in Plead Discussions Automatically Invalidate a Guilty Plea?, 40 ABA SUP. CT. PREVIEW 316 (2013)

Who Bears the Burden of Proof When a Defendant Charged with Conspiracy Produces Evidence That He or She Withdrew Outside the Statute of Limitations?, 40 ABA SUP. CT. PREVIEW 90 (2012)

Does the Fourth Amendment Permit a Jail to Strip Search All Inmates, Including Inmates Arrested for Minor Offenses?, 39 ABA SUP. CT. PREVIEW 19 (2011) (co-author with Michelle Trombley, Esq.)

The Armed Career Criminal Act & Revised State Drug Sentencing: It Depends on What “Is” Means, 38 ABA SUP. CT. PREVIEW 288 (2011)

Does the Federal Witness-Protection Murder Statute Require Proof That the Victim Would Have Communicated with a Federal Officer or Judge?, 38 ABA SUP. CT. PREVIEW 261 (2011) (cross-posted on SCOTUSblog)

Does the Speedy Trial Act Exclude from Its Trial Deadline the Time During Which a District Court Resolves Any Pretrial Motions, Even When the Motions Do not Delay Trial?, 38 ABA SUP. CT. PREVIEW 220 (2010) (cross-posted on SCOTUSblog)

When Are Defendants Exempt from a Minimum Consecutive Sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)?, 38 ABA SUP. CT. PREVIEW 24 (2010) (cross-posted on SCOTUSblog)

How the Court Retooled Miranda, NAT’L L.J. (July 14th, 2010)

May the State Require the Defense to Produce a Prosecution Witness for Cross-Examination?, 37 ABA SUP. CT. PREVIEW 165 (2010)

Do Prisoners Have a Constitutional Right to the State’s Biological Evidence?, 36 ABA SUP. CT. PREVIEW 302 (2009)

Review of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2007 Criminal Term, NAT’L L.J. (Aug. 2008)

Review of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2006 Criminal Term, NAT’L L.J. (Aug. 2007)

Review of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2005 Criminal Term, NAT’L L.J. (Aug. 2006)

Thorton Recasts Vehicle Searches under Belton, N.Y. L.J. (Aug. 5th, 2004)

Renewed Questions about Pretext Stops and Racial Profiling, N.Y. L.J. (Sept. 15th, 2003)

Using Medical Hearsay Evidence to Prosecute Child Abuse, N.Y. L.J. (March 26th, 2003)

Grounds May Exist to Challenge Orders Suspending Speedy Trials in Aftermath of September Attack, 74 N.Y. ST. B.J. 34 (2002) (co-author with Hon. Paul G. Feinman)

Pretext Stops and Racial Targeting Claims after People v. Robinson, N.Y. DEF. ASSOC., DEF. PRACTICE REPT., at 11 (Sept.-Oct. 2002)

Has the High Court Bought Repeat Felons a Ticket to “Apprendi-Land?”, N.Y. L.J. (Sept. 16th, 2002)

Reviewing Issues of Domestic Violence Victims’ Privilege, N.Y. L.J. (May 20th, 2002)

Juror Investigations by the Prosecution in New York, N.Y. L.J. (Dec. 14th, 2000)

“Buy and Bust” Rulings Threaten Judicial Independence, N.Y. L.J. (June 12th, 2000)

Supreme Court Raises Strategic Issues for Defense, N.Y. L.J. (March 30th, 2000)

Defendants in Possession Cases Face a Standing Dilemma, N.Y. L.J. (June 30th, 1999)

High Court Improves Standing of Social Guests, N.Y. L.J. (Jan. 12th, 1999)

Editorial Positions

WASHINGTON LEGAL ETHICS DESKBOOK (WSBA 2nd ed.) (forthcoming)

Other Writings

Contributor, LEGAL ETHICS FORUM, Sept. 2012-present

The LLLT Program in Washington State Progresses with a Comprehensive RPC Proposal, AALS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY NEWSLETTER (Fall 2014)

Commentary, Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, SCOTUSBlog (Oct. 11th, 2011)

The Court Debates Intent Versus Reasonable Possibilities, SCOTUSblog (April 1st, 2011)

The Speedy Trial Act, Motion Time, and “Un-Cert-Worthy Questions”, SCOTUS blog (Feb 23rd, 2011)

The Supreme Court Narrows an Exception to Mandatory Firearm Sentences, SCOTUSblog (Nov. 17th, 2010)

Briscoe v. Virginia: A Post-Decision Interview, PREVIEW ONLINE (Feb. 2010)

Commentary, Davis v. WA & Hammon v. IN, SCOTUSblog (June 19th, 2006)

Guest contributor, PRAWFSBLAWG, Aug.-Sept. 2005; Jan., June & Oct. 2006; June 2007; Aug. 2008; March 2009; June 2010; July 2012

Contributing editor, CRIMPROF BLOG, 2008 to 2009

Works In Progress

Sepultura as a Thrash Metal Guide to Social Justice and Zealous Advocacy