Publications

Perception and Attention Lab members in bold; advisees underlined

  1. Lande, K., Addleman, D., Buehler, D., & Baker, N. (in press). Structured representations in perception. Book chapter invited for Neuroscience & Philosophy (Vol. 2), The MIT Press.
  2. Ortego, K. M., Addleman, D. A., Störmer, V. S. (2025). Early cortical sensitivity and speeded attentional selection underlie incidentally learned prioritization of visual features. Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0607-25.2025
  3. Chapman, A. F., Störmer, V. S., & Addleman, D. A. (2025). In defense of attention: Why perceptual selection cannot be replaced by decision boundaries. Commentary on “Visual attention in crisis” by Rosenholtz, R. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X2500010X
  4. Addleman, D. A., Rajasingh, R., & Störmer, V. S. (2024). Attention to object categories: Selection history determines the breadth of attentional tuning during real-world object search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001575. Open Materials.
  5. Xiong, Y., Addleman, D. A., Nguyen, N. A., Nelson, P., & Legge, G. L. (2023). Dual sensory impairment: Impact of central vision loss and hearing loss on visual and auditory localization. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.64.12.23
  6. Addleman, D. A., & Störmer, V. S. (2023). Distractor ignoring is as effective as target enhancement when incidentally learned but not when explicitly cued. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02588-y. Open Materials.
  7. Wöstmann, M., Störmer, V.S., Obleser, J., Addleman, D. A.,* Andersen, S.,* Gaspelin, N.,* Geng, J.,* Luck, S.,* Noonan, M.,* Slagter, H.,* & Theeuwes, J.* (2022). 10 simple rules to study distractor suppression. Progress in Neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102269
  8. Xiong, Y.,* Addleman, D. A.,* Nguyen, N. A., Nelson, P., & Legge, G. L. (2022). Visual and auditory spatial localization in younger and older Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.838194
  9. Addleman, D. A., & Störmer, V. S. (2022). No evidence for proactive suppression of explicitly cued distractor features. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02071-7. Open Materials.
  10. Addleman, D. A., & Lee, V. G. (2022). Simulated central vision loss does not impair implicit location probability learning when participants search through simple displays. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02416-9. Open Materials.
  11. Addleman, D. A., Legge, G. L., & Jiang, Y. V. (2021). Simulated central vision loss impairs implicit location probability learning. Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.009. Open Materials.
  12. Addleman, D. A., & Jiang, Y. V. (2019). Experience-driven auditory attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.08.002
  13. Addleman, D. A., Schmidt, A., Remington, R. W., & Jiang, Y. V. (2019). Implicit location probability learning does not lead to baseline shifts of visuospatial attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01588-8
  14. Addleman, D. A., & Jiang, Y. V. (2019). The influence of attentional selection history on auditory spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000620
  15. Addleman, D. A., Tao, J., Remington, R. W., & Jiang, Y. V. (2018). Explicit goal-driven attention, unlike implicitly learned attention, spreads to secondary tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000457